Nue Media Mix™

How to Manage Multi-Channel Media Buys

February 16, 2010
— Jessie Johnson @ 5:55 am

There was a time when only a few major publications and a handful of radio and television stations existed in a local market, making it easy to plan and buy advertising. Today there can be hundreds of media outlets in the average US market, competing for both audience attention and advertising dollars.

For most advertisers, the target audience is no longer exposed to their messages only through daily newspapers or broadcast commercials. Now that audience can go online anytime to find exactly the content they want, when they want it, probably watching TV or listening to the radio at the same time.

Accordingly, marketers are spending more of their budget online, but traditional media—primarily television and radio—continue to capture a fair share of audience attention.

The US Interactive Marketing Forecast, 2009-2014 from Forrester Research reports that individuals are spending about 34% of their time online, with the rest of their time spent with traditional media—watching TV 35%, 18% listening to the radio, and 13% reading print media.

Keeping up with the changing media landscape and the divided attention of a target audience requires not only efficient tools to work with every medium, but also the real-time information and collaboration environment we’ve become accustomed to thanks to web-based technology such as search engines, social networks, and document sharing.

The challenge for media buyers and the agencies that provide those services is to be able to plan and manage multi-channel advertising campaigns efficiently, keeping up with market changes while eliminating time- and labor-intensive tasks related to planning, negotiating, and buying media.

Media Buying Automation
Media buyers can now plan, negotiate, buy, and analyze local online and offline advertising, together, with Avenue Right—radio, broadcast and cable TV, print, and online, and soon, the ability to add and customize whatever media type they want.

It’s not an ad network or exchange, but rather an agnostic media buying solution that allows its users to deliver an effective multi-channel advertising campaign without spending too much time on manual business processes, phone calls, and follow ups.

With a quick search of Avenue Right’s media outlet database, users can quickly find local advertising opportunities that specifically match their campaign criteria. Along with more mainstream local media outlets such as daily newspapers and popular radio stations, buyers can use search tags to find niche advertising opportunities, such as a community newspaper or local parenting website.

Other features and gadgets for media buyers include electronic RFP tools, multi-channel consideration sets, media schedule builders and templates, budgeting, and campaign reporting. To manage it all, there are campaign calendars, dashboards, contact management, and a customizable File Cabinet for each user.

Avenue Right not pre-purchase inventory or take commission on transactions, so the platform and any recommendations provided remain free of bias.

Learn more about Avenue Right. Contact us, request a demo, or read more.


 

Cable TV, Rate Card Management, Search Tags to Kick Off 2010

January 28, 2010
— Erin Heinrich @ 5:04 pm

Here’s a question we hear quite often during phone calls with our agency users and media outlets: “Really, you’re in Fargo? What do you there during the winter?”

Well, we build things–new features and functionality for our media buying solution. This month’s feature release brings the addition of cable television, homepage notifications, search tags, pre-negotiated schedules, and rate cards management.

I want my MTV! shopping_cart
The addition of cable television to the list of Avenue Right supported media types is a much-requested feature. Now users can add the cable outlets they work with to be included in their campaigns. Adding and requesting information for cable uses the same process as broadcast television.

Keeping you up-to-date…

Account homepage notifications allow users to keep track of what is going on in your account along with recent market activity including responses from media outlets, notices when your campaigns are scheduled to start and end, and what media outlets in your market have been added or updated (xyz media outlet updated their profile, or a new radio outlet has been added in your campaign market).

Introducing My Rates

Media buyers can manage pre-negotiated rates in their File Cabinet. Current and historical rate cards allow media buyers to keep on top of what rates they have already negotiated and review and track how those rates change over time. Users can also access these negotiated rates from within their campaigns by using the detailed schedule builder.

It’s a done deal
Pre-negotiated schedules is a great tool for media buyers that need to enter a schedule that’s already finalized with the media outlet. By creating the schedule and selecting “Finalized Proposal,” the budget, placements, and data will automatically be added to your campaign.

What’s the word
Search tags allow  you to enhance your search for media outlets by using keywords.  Media outlets have keywords associated with their information in Avenue Right that is describes the content they provide and the audience they reach.

For example,a radio station may have keywords that describe their format, such as country or rock. A media outlet can also have keywords that describe their audience, such as Hispanic or sports enthusiasts.

More big things in 2010
The coming year will bring some big updates and changes to Avenue Right, allowing users to become even more efficient in their media planning and buying. Some of the new features will include additional customization and reporting. Stay tuned!



 

Are Media Buying and Transparency Mutually Exclusive?

January 19, 2010
— Jessie Johnson @ 8:23 pm

The etymology of the word “transparent” has evolved since the 15th century–from having the ability to transmit light to being diaphanous or see-through in nature to being easily understood.

In business, transparency refers to visibility of information, made available to key stakeholders involved in a business process or practice.

And transparency in business is easier now than ever before.

The internet has changed the way we seek, gather, and verify information. It helps us solve problems in our industries, and has forever changed the way we bring products to market. This challenges the isolation and protection of information that was once used to conduct business to one party’s advantage, creating mistrust in the business environment.

After all, if a company isn’t forthcoming about its products, practices, and policies, there are always blogs and online communities that provide that information directly from consumer to consumer.

Media Buying by Nature is a Non-Trusting Environment
It’s an industry driven largely by Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. (More on that here .)

The result of this non-trusting business environment is that the parties involved spend more and more on data—third-party verification of information because we don’t trust the information provided by the media sellers or, for agencies, because clients may not trust the agency media buyer’s experience and instincts on the right media, placements, and rates for an ad campaign.

Transparency in Media Buying

Top of mind regarding transparency in media buying today relates to ad networks and exchanges—online inventory that can be bought using an auction-style business model, where the advertiser that bids the most for a placement wins it.

On some networks, however, advertisers typically have little control over the sites on which their ads will run. And the auction-based pricing model naturally favors the seller by promising the highest possible price to be paid for the inventory. (Here’s a good post on the difference between ad networks and exchanges.

In his article “Why Ad Exchanges Need Transparency,” Adam Cahill points out that when we stop buying inventory directly from the publisher and instead rely on a third-party exchange, we lose the ability to understand precisely what we bought and have instead a general sense of direction of where our ads are headed.

With the internet being used not only as another medium on which to advertise, but also a means of connecting buyer and seller, where does traditional media fit in?

Clients want to know exactly how much agencies are paying for their media buys, how much their competitors are paying, and how much of their media billings are going toward the agency’s administrative processes for planning and placing that media. And it has been argued that the relative ease of measuring online advertising has contributed to the increase in spend on that medium.

This uncertainty around price and value stems from that fact that, as Jim Edwards points out, “prices are on display for everyone to see, and everyone knows who’s paying what” for nearly every other commodity out there—from the products that line the shelves of grocery stores to the stock market to the products on sites like Amazon.com. Except for advertising media sold outside the auction, PPC, or CPA models.

Exchange Information, Not Inventory

The world has grown accustomed to the real-time transfer of knowledge attainable through the internet—open, timely information and convenience has become our expectation.

As such, media buyers and sellers need the ability to connect and exchange information before they exchange inventory—for both on- and offline media.

The platform that succeeds won’t push the media buyer into a process both prescribed and limited by the technology they use, or the medium they’re buying. It will simply open the channels of communication to facilitate information collection and analysis, process management, and execution. It must be

  • Transparent,
  • Non-biased,
  • Media-agnostic, and
  • Altogether removed from the commission chain.

This utopia must not only connect buyers with sellers of multiple media types, but it should also connect both parties with the user-driven and market-influenced data they need to participate successfully in the new and improved marketplace for advertising media.

What are your thoughts on transparency (or lack of) in the advertising industry? Are they mutually exclusive? Post your thoughts here!



 

Media Buying Efficiency: A Case Study

January 11, 2010
— Jessie Johnson @ 5:01 pm

Full-service agency Ad Monkeys uses Avenue Right to coordinate media schedules, manage information related to a buy, and provide better campaign visibility to clients.

The agency buys primarily radio and television in regional markets that cover Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. One of the primary challenges the agency faced with their media buying services was finding the time to get it done.

Ad Monkeys needed a more efficient way to manage their growing media buying services. To increase efficiencies in their media buying process, Ad Monkeys started using Avenue Right in December 2008.

Since then the agency has been able to streamline its internal workflow for media buying, increase client satisfaction through better visibility into media plans, and find more time for creative development and other services.

To learn more about how Ad Monkeys uses Avenue Right, read the full case study.


 

Media Buying Meeting Includes Agencies, Media Outlets

January 7, 2010
— Jessie Johnson @ 4:57 pm

To kick off the new year, Avenue Right hosted its first Client Meeting to talk about what tools media buyers need most in 2010, give a preview of some new features in development, and get feedback from online and offline media sellers.

Agencies from Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Dakota attended the meeting, along with sales representatives from local radio, television, online, and print media outlets.

The meeting was held January 5 at Avenue Right’s offices in the NDSU Technology Incubator.

Later this month, Avenue Right will be adding cable to its platform and releasing features such as campaign tagging, the ability to manage rates and pre-negotiated schedules, and an enhanced notifications system.

Read more about Avenue Right’s on-demand media buying software, and watch for more details on January’s feature release, based on feedback from Avenue Right users.


 

Technology & Media Buying in 2010

December 21, 2009
— Jessie Johnson @ 3:25 pm

It’s the time of year that’s full of predictions, especially in the media and marketing space. This is another one.

Common themes among the predictions for 2010 are more distributed content and media consumption patterns, more personalized experience with brands and engagement through social media, the rise of mobile, and a continued shift toward digital from traditional media.

So where does this leave media buyers?

We have ad networks and exchanges that attempt to streamline the buying process for targeted online advertising, and enterprise-level, on-premise software programs for planning and buying traditional media. Somewhere in the middle are internal processes and systems from demand-side platforms to spreadsheets and sticky notes. And data. Lots of data.

How media and technology converge this year could be the answer to a fragmented media landscape and the cumbersome buying processes that come with it.

Traditional & Online Advertising

Advertising in traditional media isn’t going anywhere, despite the growth in online spend and the decline in traditional media spend. In fact, a recent MediaPost analysis found that the percentage share of spending for each medium (except newspapers) hasn’t really changed. It’s just that online advertising (not to mention mobile, video, etc.) continues to increase, and  the apparent decline in traditional spend is just a leveling out of ad budgets to make room for digital media.

Nonetheless, it seems the coming year will bring a continued decline in traditional advertising spending, though not to the degree we saw in 2009. eMarketer CEO Geoff Ramsey also points out in his 7 predictions for 2010 that social media advertising will level off (it’s better earned), and advertising content and relevant creative will become a focus of 2010.

Technology & Innovation

This post isn’t about which media types will rise or fall in the coming year but rather the advances in technology that will enable the process of planning and buying these mediums to reach local consumers and stand out among the noise.

Increases in buying process efficiencies will improve the ROI of advertising in any medium.

The concept of bringing these systems and processes together into a single über media buying platform is not new. Some industry giants have attempted to provide the tools to buy broadcast and print media with the same convenience of running paid search campaigns through their platform, though met with little success.

At the heart of it all is an attempt not only to streamline but somewhat standardize the process of requesting proposals (RFPs), one of ClickZ’s digital media predictions for 2010 . The standardization of digital media buying through online platforms could scale to traditional media as well.

But the platform that succeeds this year won’t push the media buyer into a process both prescribed and limited by the technology they use, or the medium they’re buying. It will simply open the channels of communication to facilitate information collection and analysis, process management, and execution.

And just as marketers are finding new ways to incorporate social media into their strategies or manage their media buys in a single stop with the some level of simplicity we’ve grown used to in today’s applications, these same concepts will drive the advances in and adoption of new technology that challenges current media buying models.

In essence, the technology that will help us adjust to the fragmented media landscape needs to include, at minimum, the following concepts:

  • Increased efficiencies in process via internet access to comprehensive platform
  • Real-time information driven by platform users and marketplace activity
  • A connection of buyers and sellers through communication and “social” tools (content tagging, recommendations, comparisons)
  • Customizable tools to plan, buy, and compare any medium

In an iMedia Connection video that takes a look at the marketing platforms that will evolve in 2010, Nancy Marzouk (VP Sales, x+1) explains the industry activities to watch in the coming year will be how agencies increasingly adopt advances in technology, how the base technology built years ago will hold up against innovations in today’s technology, and how multiple media types will be adopted on the ad exchanges and online platforms.  The example used in the interview was video, but this could also apply to the notion of using online tools to buy and sell offline media.

Information Exchange

And another key piece of the puzzle is real-time data, a concept with a variety of different applications. It hasbeen at the forefront of industry news lately with Nielsen’s decision to drop live local TV ratings in favor of live-plus-same-day to account for DVR viewership, and the reversal of the decision soon after under pressure from agencies and industry organizations. Among the concerns with live-plus-same-day ratings was the potential inflation of audience numbers.

Alas, the quest continues across media types to find a way to accurately measure audiences as engagement with a medium or the content delivered changes within a marketplace. Media buyers look for more accurate and real-time data, but it must be transparent and unbiased.

The need for better data has an interesting implication for media buyers—the ability to do real-time comparison of advertising opportunities and proposals, maybe even with the benefit of potential reach and frequency calculations.

Bringing it all together will be the platform that allows buyers and sellers to interact and share information, using social concepts of tagging advertising opportunities that appeal to niche audiences or adding new media outlets as they arise. This will allow marketers to reach their consumers through long tail media buying opportunities as well which, for local advertising, will no doubt become increasingly more viable channels to reach targeted consumers in the time, place, and medium that works for them.

Media buyers in 2010 will demand the information, communications, and flexibility among the tools and systems they use to plan and measure multiple media types that reach a targeted audience.

The challenge for new media buying technologies will be to incorporate all mediums—online and offline—into a single platform without interfering with inventory supply and demand or negotiations, biasing information with a commission structure, or remaining static in a digital world grown accustomed to real-time information.

Want to see how this will work in 2010? Contact us.



 

3 Ways to Organize An Advertising Campaign

November 30, 2009
— Jessie Johnson @ 5:29 am

“Out of clutter find simplicity,” Albert Einstein states in one of his Three Rules of Work.

The easiest path to this clutter-free, simplified work existence—if such thing exists— usually involves getting organized, whether it’s making a list of priority tasks, putting together a project plan, or creating a calendar of deadlines and other important dates, such as events or project milestones.

Planning and buying media for an advertising campaign—or multiple campaigns for multiple clients, or whatever the scenario—results in a whole lot of information to organize and communicate, not only for the media buyer, but the client (and the AE if different from the media buyer, and so on).

It’s All in the Details

As with every communication, the level of detail that needs to be included depends on 1) the situation, and 2) the role of the person receiving the information.

With media buying as an example, the situation would be managing and communicating dates and deadlines related to a media plan.

Keeping a media plan organized could require up to three different “views” of the campaign and schedule information. (The good news—no more than three.)

  • Internal Calendar for Agency
  • Client-facing Campaign CalendarRadio ad schedule
  • Campaign Calendar with Schedule Breakdown

Internal Campaign Calendar
This calendar is for agency eyes only, and its primary goal is to improve workflow and communicate deadlines internally. In addition to the overall campaign calendar with a schedule breakdown (a combination of the other two), the internal calendar includes

  • List of media outlets and contact info
  • Media types included in campaign
  • Ad specifications
  • Mechanical info for creative (ad sizes, file types, etc.)
  • Traffic deadlines
  • Internal notes, such as who needs to review the ad creative or whether the client has approved it

Client-facing Campaign Calendar
This calendar gives an executive-level overview of media campaign activities such as media used and run dates. The nitty gritty details of creative deadlines and date and whether to prepare a jpg or pdf don’t matter here.

What does matter is the ability to paint the picture of what ads are running when, in what mediums and through which media outlets on any given day or week or month during the campaign.

One way of categorizing this information into an executive overview for the client is by grouping it by medium, with the details below.

For fun, let’s say our example campaign uses a combination of print, radio, online, and television to promote a Christmas concert and silent auction, with a budget of $20,000 to reach 25-55-year-olds. Our Client-facing Campaign Calendar might be organized like…

  • Radio Ads

- Media Outlet: Lite Rock 55.5
- Run Dates: November 10 – November 19, 2009
- Ads Per Week: 40
- Length: 30 seconds

- Media Outlet: Country Hits 77.7
- Run Dates: November 13 – November 29, 2009
- Ads Per Week: 50
- Length: 30 seconds

- Etc.

  • Print Ads

- Media Outlet: Local Newspaper  (daily)
- Run Dates: November 9 – 15, 23 – 29
- Ads per week: 3
- Size & Format: 1/4 page, color

And so on, for each media type and schedule included in the campaign.

Some clients may be interested in seeing the estimated number of impressions by media type or schedule, too, for example when the “client” is the marketing budget decision maker of an in-house agency.

A nice touch is color-coding advertising schedules by medium or media outlets in a standard weekly or monthly calendar format. Charts that break down the campaign’s budget allocation by medium and/or the potential reach of each medium used in the campaign provide nice summary visuals as well.

Campaign Calendar with Schedule Breakdown
And finally, this particular calendar lies somewhere in the middle of the previous two, good for keeping track of all the details related to a campaign in a single spot. It provides a more detailed summary of the media schedules confirmed for a campaign, without the noise of traffic deadlines and creative specs for internal use.

So, it includes all the info in the Client-Facing Calendar, plus

  • Placement-specific details

- For radio and television, daypart and program information
- For print and online, ad size and location on page or screen
- Estimated impressions
- Placement total

Campaign Summary
Somewhere along the way, these details should roll up into an overall campaign summary that provides a snapshot of

  • Campaign Criteria
  • Total Budget
  • Run Dates
  • Media Types Used
  • Budget Allocation by Medium
  • Overall Potential Reach

The categories required for each calendar will vary by agency, client, or campaign.

Nonetheless, a standardized approach to tracking and managing media schedules and their preceding deadlines will help you save time, stay organized, and improve communication among campaign stakeholders.



 

Right Message, Right Person, Right Time

November 18, 2009
— Jessie Johnson @ 5:36 pm

With each campaign, media buyers strive to reach more of the right people, more often, and with a relevant message.

But, this isn’t always as easy as a numbers game. The optimized mix of reach, frequency, and relevancy depends on a number of factors:

  • The price of the product being sold,
  • The stage of the buying cycle a prospect is in,
  • The industry or type of product being sold,
  • Whether the message is passive or intrusive, and
  • Whether it’s a brand message or a call-to-action.

Reach and the Buying Cycle

Early Consideration – Create awareness through an advertising campaign targeted to the audience segment deemed most likely to want or need the product or service.

Search to Fill Need or Want – Invest in paid search and organic search, and have the appropriate technology in order to gather, route, and measure lead sources.

Evaluation – The longest stage, nurture marketing, the proper frequency of messaging, and the right content are critical to moving prospects through this phase.

Purchase Decision – Blogs, website, and collateral materials need to offer the appropriate amount of credibility via customer value proof points (case studies), testimonials, and positive viral chatter/messaging.

Again, the right mix as aligned to the buying cycle depends upon the product or service being advertised, and the immediacy of the need being filled—someone who needs a fancy latte to jumpstart their day is just as qualified a prospect at the Early Consideration stage as a person evaluating life insurance options would be in the Purchase Decision stage.


 

9 Circles of Media Buying Hell, Almost

November 10, 2009
— Jessie Johnson @ 5:28 am

We’ve spent a lot of time over the last few months talking to agencies about what pains them most in the media buying process and the dilemmas they face in planning and placing media for their clients.

Regardless of the varying degrees of complexity in their media buys or the tools used, a few common themes emerged. Here’s how they fit into the circles of hell described in Dante’s Divine Comedy. Almost.Dante - Spirits in Purgatory

Circle 1: Limbo

The decent begins with the uncertainty of just where to begin a planning for a new campaign, especially if it’s an unfamiliar market. Where to look to find the most relevant media outlets? What is the population of that market? Should early consideration be based on reach and frequency into a target demographic, or is it okay to trust my gut on content      relevancy?

Circle 2: The Lustful
The folks in this circle lust for a large number of impressions—whether via traditional or online mediums—but don’t necessarily care if they are the right impressions to reach a targeted audience.

It’s why ads for the liquor store might perform better on a rock radio station than the local mommy mag, even though both media outlets may share the same audience description, 18-35 year-olds.

Ever had a client that cared more about quantity of impressions over quality? They need to see the fit of a medium or specific media outlet based on the relevance of the outlet’s content to the target demographic.

Circle 3: The Gluttonous
Many media planners and buyers have a notorious appetite for sticky notes. They devour a feast of sticky notes, fat-fingering info into multiple systems and spreadsheets just to plan a single media buy and manage the budget, media outlet contacts, negotiations, creative deadlines and mechanical info, campaign schedules, and so on.

Circle 4: Wastefulness
This circle of hell is marked by the amount of time wasted in trying to track and manage information related to a media buy (see Circle 3), including phone calls, emails, and faxes schedules and POs. In a client survey this last summer, one Avenue Right user mentioned that it used to take 30-40 hours of research, manual tasks, and follow-ups to plan and buy media for a small-scale $15,000 local advertising campaign.

Circle 5: Wrath and Sloth
The slow-moving time it takes to gather media outlet contact and inventory information, request and negotiate schedules, manage the budget, track deadlines, etc. is like the business process equivalent of sloth.

Wrath? Well, manual tasks are frustrating at a time when we’re used to automation, or at least the concept of it.

Circle 6: Dissent & Disruption
Dante’s circle for Heretics and their flaming tombs may be a bit harsh for this comparison. But in keeping with the theme of this post, we could say these are these are the folks who challenge traditional processes of buying media and embrace new technology to solve the old problem of inefficiency and outdated information. (Wait a minute…that sounds like Avenue Right!)

Circle 7: Violence

My own experience with media buying could be summed up as Violence Against Office Supplies and Eating Utensils. Mainly throwing pens at the wall, or stabbing plastic forks into erasers and then breaking off the prongs. All this while taking calls from media outlet sales reps, sending follow-up emails, and trying to keep an up-to-date version of the campaign information in a spreadsheet that showed the specific schedules and total potential reach of all media types used in the campaign.

Circle 8 & 9: Information (Ex)change
In Dante’s hell, these last circles were filled with fraudulent advisors, sorcerers, flatterers, the sowers of discord, and so on—this is the place where a side-by-side comparison of media buying to the epic poem ultimately comes to an end.

Unless, however, it really does require a bit of sorcery to keep up with the constantly changing advertising inventory and rates available in a given marketplace.

On top of that new media outlets become available, existing outlets consolidate or change format, or close entirely.  Information on actual rates has traditionally been protected by buyers and sellers as agencies compete for buying power in a given marketplace to win a client’s business.

Many media buyers and sellers are inherently biased when it comes to planning media, or proposing a campaign schedule. It’s what makes them good at their jobs. Sales reps are often trained to pitch adamantly against other mediums, regardless of the benefits the other media types might hold for an integrated campaign.

Cardinal Virtues of Media Buying?
Granted, not all the feedback on current media buying processes was reminiscent of hell and worthy of a trip through Dante’s Inferno, but it can highlight the path to better and more efficient media buys.

We’ll follow up with a post on the 7 Virtues of Media Buying. Until then, here are a few tips to avoid falling into one of the circles of media buying hell:

  • Stay open to an integrated approach to media buying.
  • Start with a broad consideration set of multiple mediums.
  • Reach the right audience.
  • Use technology to streamline media planning and buying. (Yes, as a software-as-service company, we’re biased toward using technology to automate unwieldy and inefficient processes and get better, real-time information. See how it can work for your agency.)
  • Circle 7 is still okay. The office supplies won’t be missed once these manual processes are automated. (Learn more about media buying automation.)

Image Credit – Engraving by Gustave Dore (1870). Photo Courtesy: iStock


 

Why Multi-Channel Matters

October 27, 2009
— Jessie Johnson @ 5:13 pm

The media landscape today is often described as fragmented—the abundance of options we have as consumers to view, read, or listen to content.

For advertisers, it’s the abundance of media outlets available to deliver their message.

Consumers are no longer exposed to advertising messages only through daily newspapers or broadcast commercials—now they can go online anytime to find exactly the content they want, when they want it.

And the trend in advertising spend reflects this shift in audience attention. In 1998, 95% of advertising dollars were spent on print, radio, and television—traditional media. Research  predicts roughly 33% of the $605 billion global advertising spend will move from traditional to online media over the next three years (“Social Media/Networking.” America’s Growth Capital, Sept. 2008).

But for now, that advertising spend remains disproportionate to the time spent with each medium.           time-spent-vs-budget

This gap might suggest that some media types—in particular radio and online—are still perceived as more difficult and complex to plan, buy, and measure.

No One-Size Fits All

Further complicating the media buying process is the difficulty in determining which media are truly most effective in reaching a given target audience, and there’s no shortage of research and reports available to show the advantages of one medium over another.

But ultimately, the effectiveness with which a medium (broadcast, print, online) or media outlet (specific publication, radio station, website, etc.) can reach a target audience depends more on the campaign itself—advertising objectives, budget, and above all, target audience media consumption habits.

It all depends on the target audience—what channels and content are relevant to that demographic.

Different media types can be used to complement each other as well.

One study measured the impact of multi-channel advertising by looking at the combination of television and online media, demonstrating greater brand recognition and recall among people exposed to an ad in multiple mediums—30% of respondents remembered the ad after seeing it only on television, compared to 78% recall among those who saw the ad both online and on television (eBusiness Center, Dec. 2008).

Another study found that newspaper ads sent consumers online or to the store 56% of the time to research and purchase products seen in the print ads.

Ultimately, there will never be a one-size-fits-all medium that reaches 100% of the target audience 100% of the time.

An integrated, multi-channel advertising campaign has the greatest potential for reaching a specific audience with enough frequency to drive action. Results.



 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »